*
While Gainsbourgh's most famous portraits of boys were boys costumed in 17th century cavaler fashions, he also painted boys in contemporary styles. We see unbreeched boys in dresses. A good example is Master John Heathcote wearing a long white dress with a blue sash. Gainborough painted the boy about 1771. Most of the portraits show boys dressed much like their fathers, only in smaller sized. At the end of his career, however, boys began to appear in a new destinctive child's fashion-the skeketon suit. The 1784 portrait of the Baillie family, for example, shows a boy in an early version of the skeleton suit. He wears a comfortable looking, bu fancy open lace collar. The pants have big buttons attaching to the jacket. Note the foreshortened trousers and buttons. The pants, while not yet long pants, are longer than knee breeches and fall unclosed. Like many boys in late 18th century portraits, he wears a sash around his waist. Another difference between the late 18th and early 19th century outfits is that the boy wears buckle shoes rather than strap shoes.
While Gainsbourgh's most famous portraits of boys were boys costumed in 17th century cavaler fashions, he also painted boys in contemporary styles. We see unbreeched boys in dresses. A good example is Master John Heathcote wearing a long white dress with a blue sash. Gainborough painted the boy about 1771. There is a very sad story behind the painting. John Heathcote was the son of an aristocratic parents. The portrait was painted when the boy was 4-5 in 1771 as a keepsake for the family who had recently lost ALL their other children in an epidemic. It goes to show wealth doesn't prevent tragedy. We notice Empire dresses dresses in the Marcham family portrait.
Most of the portraits show boys dressed much like their fathers, only in smaller sized.
We note Charles Marsham wearing a vest suit with the standard 18th century knee breeches. We are notbsure hiw common these vest suits were. We suspect that there was a natching kackt that webt with thevoutfit, but at home for aportrait that was suspossed to show informality, he only wore the vestand nit buttoning it. Many suits at the time were opne with vests.
Gainsborough at the end of his career began to paint boys begining to appear an to appear in a new destinctive child's fashion-the skeketon suit. The 1784 portrait of the Baillie family, for example, shows a boy in an early version of the skeleton suit. He wears a comfortable looking, bu fancy open lace collar. The pants have big buttons attaching to the jacket. Note the foreshortened trousers and buttons. The pants, while not yet long pants, are longer than knee breeches and fall unclosed. Like many boys in late 18th century portraits, he wears a sash around his waist. Another difference between the late18th and early 19th century outfits is that the boy wears buckle shoes rather than strap shoes.
Navigate the Boys' Historical Clothing Artist pages:
[Return to the Main Gainsborough page]
[Return to the Main indvidual G-L artist page]
[Chronology][Countries][Individuals][Styles]
Navigate the Boys' Historical Clothing Web Site:
[Return to the Main English page]
[Introduction] [Activities][Biographies][Chronology] [Clothing styles][Countries]
[Bibliographies][Contributions][FAQs][French glossary][Images][Links][Registration][Tools]
[Boys' Clothing Home]