The school uniform has proven to be an enormously complicated question in many countries. Interestingly the debate often touches on deep-rooted philosophical principles rather
than any serious academic research. The proponents and detractors of school
uniform generally bring up the following arguments. It is also of increasing concern to both children and patents. School for most children is the major experience with the world outside the home. About a third of the day is spent at school and about half of a child's waking hours. School clothing did not used to be a great issue. Mom and dad chose it or the school had a uniform. In our modern world, kids have become much more concerned with their clothes. This simply reflects our modern values and the interest of adults in clothes. Children can, however, without some of the moderating influences that come with age and experience, become much more obsessed with clothing. Kids that come tonschool in unfassionable clothes can be teased or even bullied. Other kids may ber attacked to obtain jackets. The cost of those clothes and conflicts associated weith them have caused many schools and parents to reaasess the school uniform. School uniform usage berginning in the 1960s began to decline in some areas and was increasingly seen as obselete by many in the 1970s and 80s. Some countries are, however, now beginning to reverse the decline in uniform usage. Schools in other countries are beginning to introduce uniforms for the first time. This is very controversial, however, as older pupils generally object to the idea of uniform. Some parents also see a compulsory uniform as intrusive and an infringement on their basic liberties.
Those that believe school uniforms are beneficial generally make the
Many feel that school uniforms help a school in maintaing discipline. Many school systems report uniforms help to reduce discipline problems. Some schools report dramatic declines, although opponets question some of these reports. Children today are lacking in self discipline. Many parents simply refuse to discipline their children. This makes it much more difficult on the teacher who has to deal with a class of 20-30 children througout the day.
School uniforms reduce violemce by eliminating fights and disruptions over fashionable clothes. Children invairably tease those who do not have trendy clothes. Poor children are often very sensitive about their clothes. American iner-city schools facing serious gang violence
believe that uniforms help to ease the problem.
Some say that a child in a uniform is more likely to take school seriously.
Putting on the uniform signals that he is going to school just as dad
dresses up for work. When students were dressed in "learning clothes"
rather than "play clothes" some schools report that students took a more
serious, scholarly attitude towards their studies.
Many parents and even some children generally believe that student wearing uniforms looked nicer and that a uniform policy ensured that children woukld come to school in appropriate clothing, avoiding distractions such as fads considered outlandish or overly revealing. A HBC reader in the U.S. writes, "I read a book showing how children dress for school in the U.K. and showed it to my mom. She said those boys look neat clean and disiplined. I also think the same the saying goes, "If you look nice you are going to act nice like a gentelman. Kids today cannot accept those kind of displinary clothes they whant to were those ugly baggy things and they are ugly looking clothes! My mother said its a fad and they will grow out of it, but I myself don't think its going to happen. I know our school distric puts millions of dollars for soccer fields and other sports. I spoke with a school board member about getting school uniforms for the kids the answer was, 'We dont have the money.' I showed him a photo of the way the kids dress in Papatoe High School in new zeland he said its probaly a fake photo. Can you belive that!"
No morning confusion. Many parents in schools with uniform policies indicated that they no longer had the morning debate over "what to wear." Some students have turned school into an unending fashion show. This is embarassing to the children who can "keep up" and it detracts from the focus on academics. There is no doubt that some children spend more time selecting their wardrobe then doing their home work.
School uniforms stress that individuality and self-expression are
not determined by designer clothing or the latest fashion fad.
The school uniform readily identified students as a member of that school and increased student safety on and off campus. Uniforms readily identify who belong on campus and who does not. Unfortunately this isa matter of increasing conern in our modern age.
Proponents say that uniforms allow students to concentrate on their studies instead of the latest fashion trends. The ideaa is to promote a better atmosphere for learning and help children concentrate on the academic program. Peer pressure appeared to take a back seat to learning.
School uniforms help to eliminates social distinctions. Children from
low-income families need not be embarassed by notbbeing able to afford the
latest fashions or designer clothes. Many chools report thatb
school uniforms do help to reuce socio-economic differences.
Uniforms are a good bargin. They are cheap and getting cheaper. They are getting less expensive than any other clothes. Proponents say that uniforms are economical. Compared to buying designer clothes this is undoubtedly true. Some children pressure their parents to buy very expensive clothes--even in elementary school. Some parents report that uniforms appeared to be more durable since they are made for repeated wash and wear. Often schools have used uniform shops, further reducing costs.
Some feel wearing a uniform help builds school spirit. They believe it instills a feeling of belonging. Parents and students in schools with
successful uniform policies often indicate that there was an improved sense of school pride and spirit.
Regimentation and supressing individuality is the most frequently cited objection to school uniforms. Some educators argue that an academic program incouraging children to pursue individual thought is much more important than what they wear. The fact that students object more to fashion concerns than to school academic progams discouraging free thought is a good indicator of why the use of uniforms to reduce concern with fashion may be beneficial.
Those that believe school uniforms are not beneficial generally make the
The oponents of school uniform maintain that students should be allowed to choose their own clothes and they shouldn't be forced to conform. The opponents feel that the inability to choose ones clothes causes children
to lose their individuality. Interestingly, many who fill strongly about this are not nearly as concerned over the insistance of many schools to avoid
contoversial issues. Different socities have place varying emphasis on conformity. In Japan it has been a strongly held goal. In America society has placed a much greater emphasis on individuality.
Some students object to any rules. Rules about their clothes are
particularly objecvtionable to some. They alter their uniform by lengthening, shortening, widening or tightening them. Tension between students and teachers sometimes occurs, as teachers try to enforce the school rules, and students resist them.
Opponents insist that there is no creditable evidence that uniforms improve school discipline or result in superior academic achievement. The principal evidence offered here is that some good students are scruffy dressers. There is no doubt that children can learn even if they dress as they want. The question not addressed is to what extent fashion, and the tendency of moden children to focus on fashion, distracts from the academic program. This issue is generally avoided by those who argue that dress is unrelated to academics.
The economics of school uniform is hotly debated. School uniform was in part adopted by some American schools so children would not try to outdo each other with highh-priced designer clothes. British parents seem nore likely to complain about high-priced uniform items.
Some parents say that uniforms are excesively costly. As they are often available from one supplier some of the market action limiting prices may not work well. Parents also complain about shoddy merchandise in addition to high prices. This also seems associated with the single source
issue. As with most of these issues, we notice a lot of opinions being offered and not so many hard facts.
The uniforms worn by affluent children going to private schools help to
emphasize class destinctions.
Children generally feel that their uniforms are dowdy and
not attractive or stylish.
Careful, clicking on these will exit you from the Boys' Historical Clothing web site, but several are highly recommended
Related Chronolgy Pages in the Boys' Historical Web Site
[Late 19th century] [The 1930s] [The 1940s] [The 1930s] [The 1940s] [The 1950s] [The 1960s] [The 1970s] [The 1980s] [The 1990s] [The 2000s]
Navigate the Boys' Historical Clothing Web Site:
[Main English school uniform debate page]
[Introduction] [Activities] [Biographies] [Chronology] [Clothing styles] [Countries]
[Bibliographies] [Contributions] [FAQs] [Glossaries] [Images] [Registration] [Tools]
[Boys' Clothing Home]