*** the American Civil War -- families youths soldiers








The American Civil War: Families and Youths

Civil War camp
Figure 1.-- Here we have a Civil War camp scene. The unit was the 31st Pennsylvania Infantry camped near Washington, D.C. A woman is shown with sleeves rolled up holding a basket, posed in front of a tent with a soldier (possibly her husband) and three children. Source: Library of Congress LC1448-600.>

Countless American families were touched by the Civil War. This was especially the case in the South where most of the War was fought. Husbands and sons enlised or were drafted and thus separated from the family. Many families were divided, especially in the border states with family members fighting on both sides. Civil War armies commonly had large numbers of youthful soldiers. Many of the soldiers and all of the younger ones were volunteers. Casualties in Civil War battles, however, were so enormous that the draft had to be introduced for the first, but not last time in American history. Given the lethality of Civil War battle, one has to ask why the average soldier, often a youth, on both sides fought. A emense number of letters survive which help answer that question and many Civil War historians have accessed this resource. [McPherson, Fields] Many boys and youths served in both the Federal and Confederate Army. One author has suggested calling the American Civil War the Boys' War. Both the Federal and Confederate armies had youthful soldiers. In addition to military personnel there were also camp followers. Some families followed their husbands and fathers into the War. Here there were both the families and officers. It was the fanilies of enlisted personnel that were most likely to be involved in camp life. Commonly they wouls support themselves by cooking, mending clothes, and doing laundry. We believe that this was much more common with Federal than Condfederate armies. This was in primarily because the Confederacy did not have the logistical capability of adequately supplying the soldiers, let alone camp followers. Also slaves flocked to the Federal lines and were at first used for labor associated with military operations.

Civilians and the War

Countless American families were touched by the Civil War. This was especially the case in the South where most of the War was fought. The most famous civilzn affected was ?? Mclean. The firt Battle of Mnasas was fought in and around his farm. To get away from the fighting he moved south. He chose a quiet backwoods community--Appomtox Court House. An in an accident of istory, it was here in his prlor that Lee surrendered to Grant. Quiet communities were overwelmed by the fighting. The small crossroad town of Gettysburg, Pennsylvania with a population of only 2,400 people was suddently inudated with tens of thousands of soldiers. After the 3-day battle there were over 27,000 Confederate and 31,000 Federal losses. The residents of Gettysburg were left to care for the wounded. The military did not have a medical serbice as is now the case. Wounded men filled private homes and the few public buildings. The people of Gettysburg also were left to bury the dead. There were dead men and horses every where. Some how Gettysburg was just shot up. Some southen cities fared much worse. Vickburg was shattered by shelling. Atlanta and Richmond were virtully burned to the ground.

Families

Family life across America suffered devastating impacts during the Civil War. The most obvious impact was the fathers, brothers, uncles and cousins that volunteeres or were drafted and soparated from the family for military servuce. Families were, however impacted in many other ways. This varied substantially depending on where the family lived. Southern families suffered more than northern families. This was because son much of the War was fought in the South. This was espcially true ov Virginia where so much of the War was fought. This was comounded as the War became a war of attrition a economics became an increasingly important part of the War. Most northern families were insulated from a war fought hundred of miles to the south. Many southerrn families were uprooted as they witnessed the destruction of their communities, homes and landholdings. And it was not just the soldiers that suffered the ordeal of separation. Mothers, children and parents at home suffeed terribkle. This was not only the pangs of separation, but often it was he family breadwinner that went to war, meaning the family's major means of support. If the father was a wage earner this ment family support. If he was a farmer that meant the person who did most of the hard work of farming, often work that women were less well equipped to do. And because of the heavy casulties, this became permanent. And here the impact was especiallyn pronounced in the South beacuse of the loss of a proportionally higher percentage of the work force and family suopport. Something like one in five of the men who fought for the Confederacy died. Here we are mostly talking about White and northerrn Black families. Slave families had their own unique experiences whuch need to be addressed. The chaos of war often dispersed African Americans, but often the families stayed together. And the War finally provided the opportunity for freedom to the Deep South. This ended the constant threat of families being split apart by members be sold and separated.

Families Separated

The massive size of Civil Wararmies mean that many men were separated from their families. The United States had fought war before, but never on sych a scale and on continental basis. Before the Civil War, most of the populaton lived their entire lives wuthin about 50 miles of here hey were born. Husbands and sons enlised or were drafted and thus separated from their families, often over substantial distances. A huge photographic record exists of the family members back home. Most of the portraits are, however, are of individuals, in some cases all the children or the mother and children. The most famous portrait of a soldier's childen is an Ambrotype of the Humiston children of a Federal soldier killed at Gettysburg. But these are relatively rare compared to the number of individual portrait. We are archiving family fortraits when we find them as they give such a wonderful view of the folks back home with all kinds of historical abd sociologial information can be gleaned as well as fashion trends. The cost of photographs was coming down with innovaion of the CDV, thus we see an increasing wide soxial spectrum in the photograhic record. Full family portraits, especially thise taken outside the studio are, however, are mostly of well-to-do families. Thus we are archiving the family image that we have been able to find.

Home life

Family life across America suffered devastating impacts during the Civil War. The most obvious impact was the fathers, brothers, uncles and cousins that volunteeres or were drafted and soparated from the family for military servuce. Families were, however impacted in many other ways. This varied substantially depending on where the family lived. Southern families suffered more than northern families. This was because son much of the War was fought in the South. This was espcially true ov Virginia where so much of the War was fought. This was comounded as the War became a war of attrition a economics became an increasingly important part of the War. Most northern families were insulated from a war fought hundred of miles to the south. Many southerrn families were uprooted as they witnessed the destruction of their communities, homes and landholdings. And it was not just the soldiers that suffered the ordeal of separation. Mothers, children and parents at home suffeed terribkle. This was not only the pangs of separation, but often it was he family breadwinner that went to war, meaning the family's major means of support. If the father was a wage earner this ment family support. If he was a farmer that meant the person who did most of the hard work of farming, often work that women were less well equipped to do. And because of the heavy casulties, this became permanent. And here the imopact was especiallyn pronounced in the South beacuse of the loss of a proportionally higher percentage of the work force and family suopport. Something like one in five of the men who fought for the Confederacy died.

Brothers and other Family Members fighting Together

Civil War regiments were recrited locally. This meant many of the men in any given unit often were friends and neigbors who knew each other before the war. Others were rekatives, most commonly cousins. Many brothers served together. This meant that some family did not just suffer one casualty, but in some cases multiple casualties. Modern Americans are familiar owith the nobie 'Savung Private Ryan' or the Sullivan Brothers, butb such instances were much more common in the Vivil War because of the hugh casualtyb rate and the klocal recriitment of fighting units. Coomunities with units in major battles coukld be severlyn ompacted meaning the families as well as the community.

Slave families

Slave families had their own unique experiences whuch need to be addressed. The chaos of war often dispersed African Americans, but often the families stayed together. And the War finally provided the opportunity for freedom to the Deep South. This ended the constant threat of families being split apart by members be sold and separated.

Families Divided

Many families were divided, especially in the border states with family members fighting on both sides. This even extended to the White House. he first lady Mary Todd Lincoln was from Kenticky. Many members of the Todd family fought for the Confederacy. More comminly families fought toghter, but there were many examples of families separated, especially in the Border States. Usually it was the chikdren that were sold off, but mothers and fathers could also be sold. Slave families had no legal standing in law.

The Soldiers

Many of the soldiers were volunteers. Casualties in Civil War battles, however, were so enormous that the draft had to be introduced for the first, but not last time in American history. Given the lethality of Civil War battle, one has to ask why the average soldier, often a youth, on both sides fought. A emense number of letters survive which help answer that question and many Civil War historians have accessed this resource. [McPherson, Fields] Many boys and youths served in both the Federal and Confederate Army. One author has suggested calling the American Civil War the Boys' War. Thousands of children were directly involved in the Civil War. Older boys served as soldiers. Many younger boys were also invoved, some boys as young as 11 years old. The younger boys generlly served as drummer or bugle boys. Commonly the drummer and bugle boys were 13-15 years of age. Both the Confederate and Union soldiers tried to look after the younger boys. In major engagements they were often sent to the rear when charges into fortifications were planned. In some cases they had to be forced to the rear crying. Such a scene is portrayed in the movie Glory. In addition, over 1 million boys of 17 or under served in the Federal Army alone. Beyond the use of very young boys as drummer boys and bugle boys, about 1 million boys 17 years of age and under fought with the Federal Army alone. Almost surely very large numbers of similarly aged boys fought with the Confederacy, although actual records are less available. Another major contribution was made by Black soldiers. The most famous Black unit was the 54th Massachusetts. While the Confederates were outraged by the Federal use of Blacks, by the ebnd of the War they were considering the formation of their own Black units.

Camp Followers

In addition to military personnel there were also camp followers. Some families followed their husbands and fathers into the War. Here there were both the families and officers. It was the fanilies of enlisted personnel that were most likely to be involved in camp life. Commonly they wouls support themselves by cooking, mending clothes, and doing laundry. We believe that this was much more common with Federal than Condfederate armies. This was in primarily because the Confederacy did not have the logistical capability of adequately supplying the soldiers, let alone camp followers.

Runaway Slaves

fter the Civil War erupted, large numbers of slaves flocked to Federal lines. Federal troops also occupied substantial areas in the rebelious states, primarily in the areas of the South along the Mississippi River and Tenessee. This mean areas with substantial numbers of slaves, especially along the Mississippi. Thus slaves as the War progressed flocked to the Federal lines with the Federal armies moved deeper into the Confederacy. Men, women, and children arrived in large numbers. The slaves who ran away and began reaching Federal units were at first referred to as "contaband". Federal law at the time (before the Emancipation Proclmation became effective--January 1, 1863) required run away slaves to be returned to their masters. Most of their masters, however, were in rebellion and such an action would have alienated northern abolitionists who were strongly supporting the Federal war effort. It would have also hurt the Federal cause in Europe where diplomats were struggling to keep Britain and France from recognizing the South. Both countrues had strong economic ties to the South which was their primary source of cotton. And by returning the runaways it would in effect assist the Confederae war effort. Thus they were at first used for labor associated with military operations.

Orphans

The caualties from Civil War battles were horendous. The War was the nost costly conflict in American history. The losses were ebormous and the American population much smaller than in the 20th century. One of the consequences of so many losses were the children of the soldiers. Not only were large numbers of fathers killed, but many were ikncapcitated to gthe point that they found it difficult to support a family. The Federal Government instituted a pension system to help support widows. The states instituted a variety of programs to help help widows and orphans. Pennsylvania created a Soldiers' Orphan School System. An example was the Chester Springs Soldiers' Orphan School. The schools also provided employment for widows. The Chester Springs School had a female principal, the widow of a soldier. She was the only female principal in the system.

Sources

McPherson, James. BookTV C-Span, October 12, 2002.

McPherson, James. Fields of Fury: The American Civil War (Atheneum, 2002). This well written book is aimed at younger readers. It includes many excerpts from the letters and dairies of young soldiers, both Federal and Confederate, helping to understand why they fought.







CIH







Navigate the CIH Civil War Site:
[Return to Main Civil War page]
[Biographies] [Campaign] [Causes] [Emancipation] [Families and youth] [Fiscal policy] [Formations and units] [Law]
[Railroads] [Slavery] [Soldiers] [Uniforms] [Weaponry] [Lost Cause] [Civil Rights movement]
[Return to CIH Home page]






Created: 2:53 AM 11/19/2006
Last updated: 12:47 AM 10/14/2023