Figure 1.--These short-legged, short-sleeved union suits for both boys and girls were designed to simplify dressing by having no buttons at all. They stretch in such a way that they can be put on and taken off without the use of any buttons.

These short-legged, short-sleeved union suits for both boys and girls were designed to simplify dressing by having no buttons at all. They stretch in such a way that they can be put on and taken off without the use of any buttons. Even the seat is constructed with stretch elastic so that they open and snap back into place. These were clearly designed for younger children who would have trouble with buttons. They do not appear to have been very practical because repeated washings would make the garments loose much of their elasticity so that they would become baggy. This innovation did not really catch on and seems to have been dropped within a few years. Note that in the same advertisement, two-piece underwear for children is also being advertised. Union suits for children were still being made up through the 1940s and into the 1950s. But by the late 1940s their popularity was in rapid decline. Partial text: “No Buttons or Fasteners on Tu-Way Switch Quickees Union Suits. Features that Make Life Easier for Mothers: Economical, Sagless Drop-seat; Streamlined Appearance; Perfect Comfort; Soft Fabric; Free Booklet”

Navigate the Boys' Historical Clothing Web Site:
[Main U.S. page]
[Main U.S. 1930s page]
[Introduction] [Activities] [Biographies] [Chronology] [Cloth and textiles] [Clothing styles] [Countries] [Topics]
[Bibliographies] [Contributions] [FAQs] [Glossaries] [Satellite sites] [Tools]
[Boys' Clothing Home]

Navigate the Boys' Historical Clothing Web Site:
[Sailor suits] [Sailor hats] [Buster Brown suits] [Knickers] [Short pants]
[Eton suits] [Rompers] [Tunics] [Smocks] [Tights] [Long stockings] [Stocking supporters]

Created: 1:01 PM 10/15/2004
Last updated: 1:01 PM 10/15/2004