|
We see many portraits of boys wearing long dresses. We are not yet sure about girls of comparable ages. Both boys on the previous page in the 1880s had ankle length drsses. This depended on chronological fashions as well as the age of the child. The really long hems look rather unusual on young children. And we are not sure why this was so common. Long hems were worn for women both for modesty and fashion. Both of these factors would seem less important for very young children especially little boys. Long dresses were, however, very common, especially for the yonger boys. We are not sure why this was, but there are some possibilities. One is warmth. Another is to provide room for growth, For centuries this was the length worn. Notab;y we see yonger boys wearing dresses even though after the mid-19th century we see older boys and gurls wearing shorter dresses. Long dresses for infants seems understandable, but for toddlers just learming how to walk they seem a vey unpractical choice. We see these long dresses into the very early-20th century.
Navigate the Historic Boys' Clothing Web dress pages:
[Return to the Main U.S dress actual length page]
[Return to the Main U.S dress length page]
[Return to the Main U.S. national dress page]
[Pinafores]
[Ringlet curls]
[Smocks]
[Bodice kilts]
[Kilts]
[Fauntleroy dresses]
[Sailor dresses]
[Fancy dresses]
[Dresses: 16th-18th centuries]
[Dresses: Early-Mid-19th century]
[Dresses: Late-19th century]
[Dresses: Early 20th century]
[Difficult images]
[Movie dresses]
Navigate the Boys' Historical Clothing Web Site:
[Introduction]
[Activities]
[Biographies]
[Chronology]
[Clothing styles]
[Countries]
[Bibliographies]
[Contributions]
[Essays]
[FAQs]
[Glossaries]
[Images]
[Links]
[Registration]
[Tools]
[Boys' Clothing Home]