American Jurisprudence: Obama Campus Star Chambers

suffegettes
Figure 1.--

Racial bias has been the major restriction on access to the judicial process, a injustice that was not addressed until the Civil Rights achievenmets (1950s and 60s). A whole new violation of due process and civil rights has been introduced by the Obama Administration--gender bias. The Obama Justice Department has acted under the authority of Title IX (a federal civil rights law part of the Education Amendments of 1972) governing many aspects of univerity life. Obama officials encouraged college and university administrators to set up star chambers/kangaroo courts to adjudicate charges of sexual misconduct. This was done to address cgarges by radical feminists based on rigged studies findindinf an orgy of rapes suffered by young women on capus as a result of lecherous male students. These courts violate almost all of the basic principles of American jurisprudene (both Fifth and Sixth Amendment protections and are more like Soviet and Chinese Communist courts. The Fifth Amendment violation is primarily the 'due process' clause. The Sixth Amendment violations include virtually every bone of the rights specifically enumeratged in the Amendment. This includes the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers is and the nature of the charges and evidence against you, and the right to confront witneses as wells the right to call witnesses of your own. Virtually all of these protection are specifically violated by the judicial procedures universisities and colleges set up at the behest of the Obama Justice Department using Title IX as the authority. These legal proceedings are the most egregious violation of basic legal protections since the Aliem and Sedition Acts (1798). One source describes them calls them as 'the rape of due process on the cmpuses of the distunguished citidels of hugher education ....' [Pruden] We find it mind bongling that this is occuring on American college campuses of all palces that you would thinj would be among the most jealous guardians of Nill of Rights protections. What we see is the most agregious violation of civil linerties since the Alien and Seition Acts (1797). The rights afforded to African American defendents during the bad old days of Jim Crow greatly exceed what the young men caught up in the Kafaesque nightmare to which male college students have been subjected. All this has been done in private. The public got a climpse of the mindset during the Senate Kavenaugh hearings (2018). The Federal Courts have finally began to address the gross vilations of civil rights.

Gender Bias

Racial bias has been the major restriction on access to the judicial process, a injustice that was not addressed until the Civil Rights achievenmets (1950s and 60s). A whole new violation of due process and civil rights has been introduced by the Obama Administration--gender bias.

Orgy Studies

These violations of basic civil rights were justified by charges radical feminists based on rigged studies findindinf an orgy of rapes suffered by young women on capus as a result of out of control lecherous male students. This is the basis cited by Ms. Ali for the denial of basic civil rights. "The statistics on sexual violence are both deeply troubling and a call to action for the nation. A report prepared for the National Institute of Justice found that about 1 in 5 women are victims of completed or attempted sexual assault while in college.3 The report also found that approximately 6.1 percent of males were victims of completed or attempted sexual assault during college.4 According to data collected under the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security and Campus Crime Statistics Act (Clery Act), 20 U.S.C. § 1092(f), in 2009, college campuses reported nearly 3,300 forcible sex offenses as defined by the Clery Act.5 This problem is not limited to college. During the 2007-2008 school year, there were 800 reported incidents of rape and attempted rape and 3,800 reported incidents of other sexual batteries at public high schools.6 Additionally, the likelihood that a woman with intellectual disabilities will be sexually assaulted is estimated to be significantly higher than the general population.7 The Department is deeply concerned about this problem and is committed to ensuring that all students feel safe in their school, so that they have the opportunity to benefit fully from the school’s programs and activities." Anyone with only the most basic knowlege of American universities knows that one in five women or not being raped or suffer an attemoted rape. These numbers are derib\ved by defining rapr and attempted rape as the most minimal contact between college students including mostly instances where no violence is involved. It is also based on the absurd assumtion that young women never lie.

Title IX

The Obama Justice Department has acted under the authority of Title IX (a federal civil rights law part of the Education Amendments of 1972) governing many aspects of univerity life. Obama officials encouraged college and university administrators to set up star chambers/kangaroo courts to adjudicate charges of sexual misconduct.

Obama Dear Colleague Letter

The 19-page Dear Colleague letter from Russlynn Ali, Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, begins inoffendlively., "The Office of the Assiatant Secretary Education has long been recognized as the great equalizer in America. The U.S. Department of Education and its Office for Civil Rights (OCR) believe that providing all students with an educational environment free from discrimination is extremely important. The sexual harassment of students, including sexual violence, interferes with students’ right to receive an education free from discrimination and, in the case of sexual violence, is a crime." Ms. Ali goes on to lay out a sytem to deny young Americans even the most basic access to the civil rights granted to all Americans in the Nill of Rights.

Violations of Fundamental Rights

These university courts violate almost all of the basic principles of American jurisprudene (both Fifth and Sixth Amendment protections) and are more like Soviet and Chinese Communist courts. In additiin to the First Amdement, the Fifth and Sixth Amendments are the crowns jewells of American civil liberties. These legal proceedings are the most egregious violation of basic legal protections since the Aliem and Sedition Acts (1798). One source describes them calls them as 'the rape of due process on the cmpuses of the distunguished citidels of hugher education ....' [Pruden] We find it mind bongling that this is occuring on American college campuses of all palces that you would think would be among the most jealous guardians of Bill of Rights protections. What we see is the most agregious violation of civil linerties since the Alien and Seition Acts (1797).

The Fifth Amendment

The Fifth Amendment violation is primarily the 'due process' clause.

The Sixth Amendment

The Sixth Amendment violations include virtually every bone of the rights specifically enumeratged in the Amendment. This includes the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers is and the nature of the charges and evidence against you, and the right to confront witneses as wells the right to call witnesses of your own. Virtually all of these protection are specifically violated by the judicial procedures universisities and colleges set up at the behest of the Obama Justice Department using Title IX as the authority. The rights afforded to African American defendents during the bad old days of Jim Crow greatly exceed what the young men caught up in the Kafaesque nightmare to which male college students have been subjected.

Kavenaugh Hearings (2018)

All of the university proceedings were done in private. this has been done in private. The public got a climpse of the mindset during the Senate Kavenaugh hearings (2018). Many Americans were appaled by the excesses to which Judge Kavenaugh was subjected. And he had the right to councel and some fair-minded senators. And the public exposure of the totalitarian mind set involved here was a shock. Accused male students had dome of the protection of public scrutiny. They were judged and convicted behind closed doors with not right of appeal.

Purdue University Case

The campus sexual assault lawsuit brought by an unidentified male student against Purdue University is one of the first such cases to be heard by a federal appellate court since the Obama U.S. Department of Education issued its 'Dear Colleague' letter (2011). The number of such cases awaiting a ruling continues to grows in each of yhe circuit courts. The case began when a female student at Purdue accused vher boyfriend of raping her while she slept. Of corse the most appliaction of common sence immediately would cause one to wonder how she knew if she was asleep or how one could sleep while bring raped. Even so with apparently with no real unbiased investigation, Purdue University began proceedings. The Perdue 'invesigation' according to one author was 'so amateurish and biased that bit bis frankly difficult tomimagine thatbhiman adults could believe it wa fair or adequate." [French] And this at one of our great universities. But such inestigatiins were not intended to investigate, but to insure that Ms. Ali's vigilates in the Obama Afministration do not descend on the unibersity with chrges of gender bias. The rights mandated to all Anerivans had to be ignored on the altar of political correctness and possible loss of Federal grants. The accued male student was denied the tight of appeal by Purdue. He and others like him had to turn tp the Federal courts gor relief. In his testimont to the court, he reported that he had no opportunity to see or examine “any of the evidence the [proceedings] relied on to determine guilt and punishment.” There was no opportunity to cross-examine his accuser, which would have been difficult in any event because she dis not have to appear in the bPurdue proceedings. The Purdue panel found the accuser 'credible' even though the panel never saw her, did not talk to her, and she was not required to swear a written allegation or even to write her own statement. The accused young male student was not permitted to present witnesses or evidence. [Pruden] As a result of the Purdue Pannel, the accused young man lost his Navy ROTC cholarship.

Federal Courts

The Federal Courts have finally begun to address these gross Obama era violations of basic civil rights. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appdeals in Chicago has come to the rescue of the Bill of Rights. They have acted to protect the Fifth and Sixth Amendments from lower court abuse at the hands of activist judges. The Seventh Circuit has esrablished a precedent blocking biased sexual-assault that will hopely end the violation of basis civil rights by university administrators behind closed doors. This was done by a pannel of all woman jurists led by Amy Coney Barrett, a potential furure Supreme Court pick. The court ruled on the closed door action of administrators at Purdue University. The Purdue process, such as it was, Judge Barrett said, “fell short of what even a high school must provide to a student facing a days-long suspension.” Withholding evidence from the plaintiff was sufficient to render the proceedings unfair, as was “the failure to provide any means of examining the accuser’s credibility.” The evidence available, Judge Barrett wrote, suggests the Purdue panel “decided that [the plaintiff] was guilty based on the accusation rather than the evidence.” [Pruden]

Sources

French, David. National Review.

Pruden, Wesley. "And now the turning of the shrew," Washington Times, p. B1.







CIH






Navigate the Children in History Website:
[Return to Main U.S. Bill of Rights page]
[Return to Main U.S. Constitutionm page]
[Return to Main U.S. history page]
[Return to Main history of trials]
[About Us]
[Introduction] [Animals] [Biographies] [Chronology] [Climatology] [Clothing] [Disease and Health] [Economics] [Ethnicity] [Geography] [History] [Human Nature] [Law]
[Nationalism] [Presidents] [Religion] [Royalty] [Science] [Social Class]
[Bibliographies] [Contributions] [FAQs] [Glossaries] [Images] [Links] [Registration] [Tools]
[Children in History Home]






Created: 4:42 AM 7/8/2019
Last updated: 4:42 AM 7/8/2019